Start Submission

Reading: Reasons for Regulating Informal Relationships: A comparison of nine European jurisdictions

Download

A- A+
dyslexia friendly

Articles

Reasons for Regulating Informal Relationships: A comparison of nine European jurisdictions

Author:

Charlotte Mol

Utrecht University School of Law
X close

Abstract

In Europe, informal relationships have been increasing in number. While the regulation of informal relationships is recent and relatively limited, nine European jurisdictions have taken legislative action and adopted a lex specialis for informal relationships. This article takes a comparative approach in order to answer the following questions: What were the incentives and reasons for the regulation of informal relationships in the family laws of nine European jurisdictions and are these reasons reflected in the legal definitions and effects? And if so, how? Using the most recent national reports of the Commission on European Family Law, the comparative analysis reveals five common reasons and incentives: (1) the steady increase of informal relationships, (2) the financial protection of a vulnerable party, (3) the influence of national Constitutions, (4) the recognition of same-sex couples and (5) the protection of the common child. The comparison also reveals that in spite of these shared reasons, there is great diversity in the legal definitions and effects in the nine European jurisdictions.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.347
How to Cite: Mol, C., (2016). Reasons for Regulating Informal Relationships: A comparison of nine European jurisdictions. Utrecht Law Review. 12(2), pp.98–113. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.347
68
Views
24
Downloads
Published on 02 Jul 2016.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF

    comments powered by Disqus