Start Submission

Reading: Theorizing Mediation: Lessons Learned from Legal Anthropology


A- A+
Alt. Display


Theorizing Mediation: Lessons Learned from Legal Anthropology


Marc Simon Thomas

postdoctoral researcher at the Montaigne Centre for Judicial Administration and Conflict Resolution, Utrecht University School of Law, Utrecht (the Netherlands)., NL
X close


Since the 1990s, there has been an increasing interest in mediation in the Netherlands, as part of a set of ‘alternative dispute resolution’ methods. Politicians, lawyers and practitioners have embraced mediation as a legitimate method for settling disputes, alongside the adjudication of conflicts in courts of law. However, there is a striking lack of literature aimed at theorizing mediation from a legal perspective. This article argues that the legal anthropology literature on disputes and dispute settlement offers useful insights for understanding mediation from a ‘legal research’ point of view. This is because a lot of current common knowledge on mediation has its roots in a legal anthropological understanding. The argument that is set forth in this article is that the most important lesson that can be learned is that mediation should not be seen in isolation, but as part of a social process.

How to Cite: Simon Thomas, M., 2016. Theorizing Mediation: Lessons Learned from Legal Anthropology. Utrecht Law Review, 12(1), pp.50–60. DOI:
Published on 29 Jan 2016.
Peer Reviewed


  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus