Volume 12, Issue 1, 2016 -

Back to all issues

Articles

Rethinking European Competition Law: From a Consumer Welfare to a Capability Approach

Rutger Claassen, Anna Gerbrandy
- PDF (EN)
30 Jan 2016

:1-15
Balancing Public and Private Regulation

Martijn Scheltema
- PDF (EN)
30 Jan 2016

:16-31
The Presumption of Innocence as a Counterfactual Principle

Ferry de Jong, Leonie van Lent
- PDF (EN)
30 Jan 2016

:32-49
Theorizing Mediation: Lessons Learned from Legal Anthropology

Marc Simon Thomas
- PDF (EN)
29 Jan 2016

:50-60
The Development of the Concept of Contributory Negligence in English Common Law

Emanuel G.D. van Dongen, Henriëtte P. Verdam
- PDF (EN)
29 Jan 2016

:61-74
EU Executive Rule-Making and the Second Directive on Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision

Ton van den Brink, Hans van Meerten
- PDF (EN)
29 Jan 2016

:75-85
The Right of a Victim to a Review of a Decision not to Prosecute as Set out in Article 11 of Directive 2012/29/EU and an Assessment of its Transposition in Germany, Italy, France and Croatia

Ante Novokmet
- PDF (EN)
29 Jan 2016

:86-108
Accounting Standards and Legal Capital in EU Law

Loukas Panetsos
- PDF (EN)
29 Sep 2016

:139-158
Parliamentary Supremacy versus Judicial Supremacy
How can adversarial judicial, public, and political dialogue be institutionalised?

Veit Bader
- PDF (EN)
10 Oct 2016

:159-183

Volume 12, Issue 1, 2016 -

Articles

Rethinking European Competition Law: From a Consumer Welfare to a Capability Approach

Balancing Public and Private Regulation

The Presumption of Innocence as a Counterfactual Principle

Theorizing Mediation: Lessons Learned from Legal Anthropology

The Development of the Concept of Contributory Negligence in English Common Law

EU Executive Rule-Making and the Second Directive on Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision

The Right of a Victim to a Review of a Decision not to Prosecute as Set out in Article 11 of Directive 2012/29/EU and an Assessment of its Transposition in Germany, Italy, France and Croatia

Accounting Standards and Legal Capital in EU Law

Parliamentary Supremacy versus Judicial SupremacyHow can adversarial judicial, public, and political dialogue be institutionalised?

Student Papers

International Framework AgreementsAn analysis of the international framework agreement as an instrument for improving working standards in global business operations

State Responsibility in PeacekeepingThe effect of responsibility on future contributions

Issue Archive

Volume 13, Issue 2, 2017

Volume 13, Issue 1, 2017

Volume 12, Issue 2, 2016

Volume 12, Issue 1, 2016

Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2015

Volume 11, Issue 1, January 2015

Volume 10, Issue 5, December 2014

Volume 10, Issue 4, November 2014

Volume 10, Issue 3, June 2014

Volume 10, Issue 2, May 2014

Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2014

Volume 9, Issue 4, September 2013

Volume 9, Issue 3, July 2013

Volume 9, Issue 2, March 2013

Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2013

Volume 8, Issue 3, November 2012

Volume 8, Issue 2, May 2012

Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2012

Volume 7, Issue 3, October 2011

Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2011

Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2011

Volume 6, Issue 3, November 2010

Volume 6, Issue 2, June 2010

Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2010

Volume 5, Issue 2, October 2009

Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2009

Volume 4, Issue 3, December 2008

Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2008

Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2008

Volume 3, Issue 2, December 2007

Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2007

Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2006

Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2006

Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2005

Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2005

Published by Utrecht University School of Law | Supported by Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals

Parliamentary Supremacy versus Judicial Supremacy
How can adversarial judicial, public, and political dialogue be institutionalised?

International Framework Agreements
An analysis of the international framework agreement as an instrument for improving working standards in global business operations

State Responsibility in Peacekeeping
The effect of responsibility on future contributions