Volume 8, Issue 2, May 2012 -

Back to all issues

Special Issue on Highest Courts and Transnational Interaction

Introduction

Editorial
Highest Courts and Transnational Interaction: Introductory and Concluding Remarks

Antoine Hol
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:1-7

Articles

The Argumentative Status of Foreign Legal Arguments

John Bell
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:8-19
Reference to Foreign Law in the Supreme Courts of Britain and the Netherlands: Explaining the Development of Judicial Practices

Elaine Mak
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:20-34
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases

Ivo Giesen
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:35-54
The South African Constitutional Court Experience: Reasoning Patterns Based on Foreign Law

Andrea Lollini
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:55-87
Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts

Martin Gelter, Mathias Siems
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:88-99
Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks

Monica Claes, Maartje de Visser
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:100-114
Mapping Judicial Dialogue across National Borders: An Exploratory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges

Emmanuel Lazega
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:115-128
The Ebb and Flow of Judicial Leadership in the Netherlands

Nick Huls
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:129-138
Bringing the Outside inside: Macro and Micro Factors to Put the Dialogue among Highest Courts into its Right Context

Daniela Piana, Carlo Guarnieri
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:139-157
The Democratizing Effects of Transjudicial Coordination

Eyal Benvenisti, George Downs
- PDF (EN)
10 May 2012

:158-171

Volume 8, Issue 2, May 2012 -

Introduction

EditorialHighest Courts and Transnational Interaction: Introductory and Concluding Remarks

Articles

The Argumentative Status of Foreign Legal Arguments

Reference to Foreign Law in the Supreme Courts of Britain and the Netherlands: Explaining the Development of Judicial Practices

The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases

The South African Constitutional Court Experience: Reasoning Patterns Based on Foreign Law

Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts

Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks

Mapping Judicial Dialogue across National Borders: An Exploratory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges

The Ebb and Flow of Judicial Leadership in the Netherlands

Bringing the Outside inside: Macro and Micro Factors to Put the Dialogue among Highest Courts into its Right Context

The Democratizing Effects of Transjudicial Coordination

Issue Archive

Volume 13, Issue 2, 2017

Volume 13, Issue 1, 2017

Volume 12, Issue 2, 2016

Volume 12, Issue 1, 2016

Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2015

Volume 11, Issue 1, January 2015

Volume 10, Issue 5, December 2014

Volume 10, Issue 4, November 2014

Volume 10, Issue 3, June 2014

Volume 10, Issue 2, May 2014

Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2014

Volume 9, Issue 4, September 2013

Volume 9, Issue 3, July 2013

Volume 9, Issue 2, March 2013

Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2013

Volume 8, Issue 3, November 2012

Volume 8, Issue 2, May 2012

Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2012

Volume 7, Issue 3, October 2011

Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2011

Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2011

Volume 6, Issue 3, November 2010

Volume 6, Issue 2, June 2010

Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2010

Volume 5, Issue 2, October 2009

Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2009

Volume 4, Issue 3, December 2008

Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2008

Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2008

Volume 3, Issue 2, December 2007

Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2007

Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2006

Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2006

Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2005

Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2005

Published by Utrecht University School of Law | Supported by Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals

Editorial
Highest Courts and Transnational Interaction: Introductory and Concluding Remarks